Is there an enterprise / high-volume channel?
If you need bulk card issuance or have significant monthly volume, open a ticket describing your needs and scale — business staff will follow up directly.
In this industry, an "enterprise channel" is often imagined as a separate product line, or a VIP discount rate negotiated privately. There is no second price list here, and no hidden internal rates — the fee everyone sees is the final fee. What actually matters for large customers is to first distinguish which kind of "large" you mean: a large monthly spend, or a large number of cards needed at the same time. These two needs run through completely different mechanisms, and confusing them leads to a misjudgment of whether you are subject to limits. Breaking this layer down is far more useful than simply saying "there's a dedicated channel."
First distinguish: is your "large" about spend, or about card count?
This is the point most easily misjudged in this question. A single card's limit is a one-time total pool, not a monthly limit, and you can top up the limit at any time from your platform balance for a 2% service fee, taking effect instantly. So a large monthly spend is essentially a "limit" issue, not a "card count" issue — with 1–2 cards you keep topping up the limit to handle a large spend, and there is no need to approach your account's card cap at all. The only need actually constrained by the hard card-count limit is "needing many cards active at the same time."
| Your need | What it really is | Which rule constrains it |
|---|---|---|
| Large monthly spend / monthly top-up | A limit issue | Does not use up card-count quota; a few cards with ongoing limit top-ups suffice |
| Many cards active at the same time | A card-count issue | Subject to the hard limit of 5 active / 10 cumulative |
| Both | Limit + card count | The limit can be topped up, but card count is still hard-capped; requires alignment with business staff |
Scale discounts are already built into the tiered fees — no private negotiation needed
A large monthly spend does not require a separate discount application — the tiered top-up fee is itself a volume-pricing mechanism. Consolidate your monthly top-ups into a single large transaction and the fee automatically drops a tier; this is a rule stated in the open, applied equally to all accounts, with no "cheaper if you negotiate, more expensive if you don't." The card-issuance fee ($1–2 per card), the limit-issuance service fee (2%), and the card top-up service fee (2%) all accumulate linearly by card count or by percentage — issuing in bulk neither adds a surcharge nor grants a discount. There is no monthly fee and no annual fee; a card that sits unused after issuance incurs no charge, which makes it well suited to preparing cards ahead of need.
| Single top-up amount | Fee | What it means for large top-ups |
|---|---|---|
| 30–500 USDT | 2% | Entry tier; small amounts and first top-ups share the same rate |
| 500–1000 USDT | 1.5% | A larger single transaction drops one tier |
| Over 1000 USDT | 1% | The cost of consolidating large amounts is spread out, passing savings down to 1% |
Card count is a hard risk-control limit; bulk card-issuance needs require advance alignment
An account can have at most 5 active cards at once and 10 cumulatively — this is a hard risk-control limit. It is not a difference in product tier, nor a default that can be quietly raised: once a card range (BIN) is blacklisted on the merchant side, all users are harmed together, and the count gate protects the reputation of the entire card range — it is not relaxed for any single customer. So "large spend" mostly does not need many cards at all (see the limit mechanism above); it is the bulk-issuance need — genuinely requiring many cards active at the same time — that belongs in a support ticket where you describe the scale for business staff to evaluate case by case. What business staff can do is assess, within compliance, how to absorb your volume in a rule-compliant way — for example, handling spend with a few higher-limit cards, or rolling over expiring cards through the card-closure process — rather than simply piling up the card count on a single account. Trying to get around the cap by registering several extra accounts will instead hit the freeze red line for "bulk registration to evade risk controls"; the proper path is alignment with business staff, not bypassing the gate.
- Need type: large monthly top-up / spend, bulk card issuance, or both.
- Scale: your expected monthly top-up or monthly spend magnitude; if you need multiple cards, the number of active cards needed at the same time.
- Use case: AI subscriptions, other SaaS, or ad campaigns — merchant risk controls vary greatly by category, which directly affects the feasibility assessment.
- Rollout pace: one-time card issuance or rolling replenishment, and whether there is a time-window requirement.
- Account status: whether you have already registered and your current card count, so we can judge whether you have already reached the 5 / 10 hard limit.
Business alignment is about scale, not a promise of account-side success
The boundary needs to be stated up front. On the card side we guarantee: the card range is logically compliant, and mechanical declines (merchant category, issuer risk controls, AVS) are all 0; a failure will only be a self-checkable, mechanical cause such as insufficient limit, insufficient balance, or mistyped card details. But on the account side — whether your merchant account, IP, and spending pattern are accepted by the other party's risk controls — does not change just because scale grows; bulk campaigns or bulk subscriptions still each require a well-nurtured account, and this part carries no promise of success. Scale does not change this boundary — do not believe any claim that "high volume guarantees approval."